|
|
Government of India |
|
Integrated Wastelands Development Programme |
|
|
India shares 16% of the world
population, while its land is only 2% of the total geographical area of the world.
Naturally, the pressure on the land is often beyond its carrying capacity. Therefore, the
productive lands, especially the farmlands in the India are in the constant process of
various degrees of degradation and are fast turning into wastelands. At present,
approximately 68.35 million hectare area of the land is lying as wastelands in India. Out
of these lands, approximately 50% lands are such non-forest lands, which can be made
fertile again if treated properly. It was unprotected non-forestlands, which suffered the
maximum degradation mainly due to the tremendous biotic pressure on it. In the last 50
years it is Indias lush green village forests and woodlots have been deforested to
the maximum. It is precisely to restore this ecological imbalance by developing the
degraded non-forest wastelands, Govt. of India had created the Department of Wasteland
Development during July,1992 under the Ministry of Rural Development, which has been
subsequently reorganized and renamed Department of Land Resources, with a broader mandate. INTEGRATED WASTELAND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IWDP). The problem The degradation of environment in the fragile Indian sub-topical eco-system is basically attributed to:-
CONSEQUENCES
It is one programme which is making sincere efforts towards the empowerment of the people so that a sense of collective responsibility can be evolved among them. The new guidelines for watershed development provides a paradigm shift in the traditional approach where the role of the Government is changed from that of governance to facilitation. The institutional arrangements envisaged in the Guidelines can be seen as a true reflections of the Agenda 21 where the sustainability comes through the involvement of people & the local bodies. The approach of watershed development in a holistic manner automatically strikes a prudent balance between environmental concerns & developmental aspirations. The efforts being made under the guidelines can be termed as sincere & honest as here the survival of life itself is at stake with the watershed development rather than the quality of life itself as compared to similar situations in the developed countries. In fact , the effective community control has been an integral part of the Indian social fabric which was fragmented by the colonial rule. This programme is an effort towards its restoration & a small step in the achievement of this goal which might turn into a big leap with the support from the people.
Grand Total: 638518.31 sq. kms WHY PEOPLES PARTICIPATION? There is a close relationship between the environment and the community living within that area as the community derives sustenance from it. Increase in biotic pressure leads to over-exploitation and degradation of natural resources. Paucity of resources also leads to internal conflict giving opportunity to others to exploit the situation. It is thus necessary for people to realize the intrinsic relationship between population, poverty and degraded environment they live in. the poor, in the developing country like India are left with no option but to degrade their own environment for their very own survival. Still, it is only they who can restore the health to environment thus ruined, outside actors can only facilitate but never substitute for stake holders. Hence, there can be no sustainable natural resources management unless it involves all inhabitants of the affected areas in an active manner and development plans are formulated and executed by them. Integration of indigenous technologies with development is vital. Rural peoples knowledge and the technological advancements are complimentary in their strengths and weaknesses. Combined together, they may achieve what neither would achieve along. Low cost locally available technology with suitable intervention by latest advancements yields best solution. It is clear that the watershed development cannot be done in isolation. It is a natural entity and may contain different types of lands namely, forest lands, community lands, government lands or private lands. These lands can be treated on "ridge to valley" approach. A land lying in a valley cannot be improved if the land at upper reaches is not treated. Treatment of land in a scattered manner will not lead to wasteland development. Mere treatment of land is not enough. Land and people cannot and should not be viewed in isolation. So the best possible strategy would be treating the land by empowering the people who live in it. It is watershed plus approach which takes care of holistic development. Therefore, the entire watershed community is to be involved for the integrated development of watershed and the assets created in such an effort are to also be maintained through the people of the watershed community in order to ensure sustainability. Peoples participation also ensure conservation and development of Common Property Resources. Besides when people decide what they have to do their stake in development become more pronounced leading to their intense involvement. This involvement in decision making is the key to success which brings sustainable development. Hence peoples participation is the approach for the purpose. Integrated Wastelands Development Project (IWDP) Scheme Background:- The basic objective of this scheme is an integrated wastelands development based on village/micro watershed plans. These plans are prepared after taking into consideration the land capability, site condition and local needs of the people. The scheme also aims at rural employment besides enhancing the contents of people's participation in the wastelands development programmes at all stages, which is ensured by providing modalities for equitable and sustainable sharing of benefits and usufructs arising from such projects. Activities:The major activities taken up under the scheme are:
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION To restore the ecological balance in the degraded watersheds through sustained community action, mass mobilization is needed. The programme can only succeed when the community is motivated enough to realize that the programme is not only for eco-restoration through watershed development but also to addresses their other pressing socio-economic needs. The activities under this community organization include organizing Self Help Groups and User Groups, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercises, awareness camps, exposure visits & programmes on literacy, family welfare, social services, income generating activities etc. giving small contributions to SHGs or other village institutions like mahila mandals/ youth clubs/ anganwadis which are considered important for people participation. The idea is rapport building with the people at grass root level and PIA. The people must feel that the programme belongs to them and its success depends on them only. Once the people realize that it is they who own the programme, the sustenance of the project evolves. One of the notable features of this component is the flexibility available to the PIAs (Project Implementing Agencies). There is a provision for entry point activities for trust building exercise and speedy community organization. Under this component they can even take up those works which are not directly related to conservation and wasteland development. Certain works of great priority and importance to villagers such as repairing and construction of community and panchayat houses, sanitation improvement, provision of drinking water school building etc. can be taken up. Effective community organization is important to establish credibility of the Watershed Development Team and create a rapport with the village community who is ultimately going to own and implement the programme even after withdrawing the Government machinery. THE NEW GUIDELINES FOR WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT
MAIN FEATURES OF GUIDELINES FOR WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT
AIMS AT
Recharging Wells in IWDP Projects
THE OLD AND NEW GUIDELINES Initially, Department of Wastelands Development sanctioned 128 projects for Wastelands Development in various districts of India under Old guidelines. These guidelines envisaged a fixed work programme to be followed by District Rural Development Agencies/Zilla Parishads. Components for each project were designed by the PIAs which used to be sanctioned at the Central level.
Wasteland Development through holistic development of Degraded watershed. Employment of people through Institutional arrangementsPlanning from below bottom up approach. Sustainability through peoples participation. Equitable distribution of Usufructs. Institutional Arrangements To make the programme successful, proper Institutional arrangement has been provided in the Guidelines from state level to village level. These institutions help in making the programme broad based, sustainable and equitable. These institutions are given below:
STATE WATERSHED PROGRAMME AND REVIEW COMMITTEE State Watershed Programme Implementation and Review Committee This is an apex organisation at a state level under the chairmanship of Chief Secretary/Addl.Chief Secretary/APC. Representatives of prominent NGOs, SIRDs, Heads of Department of related Departments are also member of the Committee. The Committee undertakes monitoring, review and evaluation of Watershed Development projects. It is an important link between DRDAs and Department of Wastelands Development. Success of programme depend on functioning of State Watershed Programme Implementation and Review Committee. i. District Rural Development Agency/ZP:- DRDA/ZP is a key institution in the programme execution. The project is sanctioned in favour of the DRDA and funds are released to it directly from Government of India. The DRDA is responsible for successful implementation of the project as per guidelines and submission of various reports and returns to DoWD as well as State Government. ii. Project Implementing Agency:- The PIA is an organisation having sufficient exposure and experience in the field of community organsiation as well as watershed development activities. These organsiations can be reputed NGOs having proven credibility or technical officers like DFO, Soil Conservation Officer, Horticulture Officer, etc. The PIA is an important link between the villagers and the DRDA. It imparts technical know how to the villagers with the help of Watershed Development Team and ensures that programme is executed as per Guidelines and funds are spent judiciously. It compiles information from Watershed Committees and send to DRDA. iii. Watershed Development Team:-The Watershed Development Team is a multi-disciplinary team responsible for technical and financial supervision of the project activities. The team consists of field level officials drawn from various disciplines like forestry, soil conservation, horticulture, social sciences etc. These officials are key functionaries in sensitisation of Self help Groups/User Groups and villagers at large. iv. Watershed Development Association:- Watershed Development Association (WA) consists of all members of the village whose land is situated in the watershed area called user group (UG) and all those members who drive sustenance from the watershed area called self help group (SHG). v. Watershed Committee:- Watershed Committee
(WC) is the key institution at Watershed level consisting of about 2-3 representatives,
each of UG, SHG, Panchayat and women etc. Committee also appoints a Watershed Secretary
preferably a local man graduate from the same area. The IWDP Scheme is 100% Grant-in-Aid from Government of India. The projects are sanctioned on getting basic information from DRDAs about the watershed to be treated and capability of the PIA and over all situation in the area. A well laid criteria for selection of watersheds has been provided in para 27 of the Guidelines. The watersheds selected for the projects should be as far as possible contiguous and there should be preponderance of wastelands. Acute shortage of drinking water, low wage rates and non over lapping of watersheds with any other project are other requirements. Instead of detailed project having action plan suggested by the Government officials, the project is sanctioned after obtaining basic information in respect of project areas/watersheds and detailed action plan is prepared by the villagers themselves under the guidance of Watershed Development Team Under IWDP scheme the projects are sanctioned in non DPAP/DDP areas. Normally, not more than two projects are sanctioned in a district. The DRDA/ZP after getting satisfied that there is a need of watershed development, and that there are suitable PIAs to implement the project, send the project proposal to DoWD. DoWD after proper scrutiny of proposal, in consultation with Internal Finance Division sanctions the project in favour of DRDA/ZP concern and first instalment of allotment is released in favour of DRDA by telegraphic transfer. Funds from DRDA flow to Watershed Committees who open an account in the nearest bank to be operated jointly by WDT member and local man i.e. Secretary of WC. The Watershed Committee is the primary unit which is directly involved in implementation of the programme right from preparation of action plan and check measurements of works and payment of wages. The WC also decides usufruct sharing mechanism and post project sustenance arrangements. The WC also maintains an account called Watershed Development Fund Account, where contribution realised from the members of Watershed Associations are deposited for utilisation in post project maintenance of assets. Contribution in shape of labour, cash and kind are valued and kept in interest bearing account. Sanctioning mechanism FLOW OF FUNDS
FUNDING
PATTERN
(
DISTRIBUTION )
TRAINING OBJECTIVES OF TRAINING Successful Implementation of the Wastelands Development Projects.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF TRAINING INSTITUTIONS
TRAINING CONTENTS
VARIOUS LEVELS TO BE TRAINED State Level-Secretaries, State Watershed Programme Implementations & Review Committee Members, Head of line Departments District Level-CEO of Zila Parishad, Project Directors, District Rural Development Agencies and line Dept. Officers Block Level - BDOs & Line Deptt. Officers, Ext. Officers and Village Development Officers Project Implementing Agencies and 'would be' PIAs Watershed Development Team Members Watershed Developments WC (Watershed Committee) MembersSecretary (WC) Village volunteers Self Help Groups and Users Groups Villagers in General SustainabilityThe projects under IWDP Scheme aim at sustainability in the long run. This is achieved through the establishment of Watershed Development Fund which takes care of past project maintenance and sustenance. This fund is meant to sustain the maintenance of the assets created during the course of project implementation so that the people in the watershed area continue to reap the benefits even after the completion of the project. Further, the village level institutions such as Watershed Association/Watershed Committee remain in position even after the PIA withdraws from the project after its completion. These institutions have intrinsic strength as they are self constituted and lead by natural leaders in the villages. The institutional arrangements envisaged in the guidelines ensure sustainability through the following :
EQUITY
END RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The website belongs to the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India. The content of the website is provided by Department of Land Resources, and developed & hosted by National Informatics Centre, New Delhi, India |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright Policy | Hyperlink Policy |Terms & condition | Privacy Policy | Website Management |